[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

DTD Versions

To: Bill Brooks <wbrooks@lug.ee.calpoly.edu>
Subject: DTD Versions
From: Poet/Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 23:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ldp-docbook@lists.debian.org, ldp-discuss@lists.linuxdoc.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10006022231470.15345-100000@lug.calpoly.edu>
Resent-date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 03:04:27 -0400 (EDT)
Resent-from: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
Resent-message-id: <PPllPD.A.PQE.53KO5@murphy>
Resent-sender: ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org

Hello,

I don't know about the rest of you but I think we should ONLY accept
Docbook 3.1 at this time. It is the only official version. 4.0 is still in
beta and we can't have a bunch of different markup running around.

J

-- 
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt	- http://www.commandprompt.com	</COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC.	- http://www.opendocs.org	</PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts 	- http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP		- http://www.linuxdoc.org	</WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," 
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. 
--


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DTD Versions
  - From: Guylhem Aznar <guylhemlistes@ifrance.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Authorship
Next by Date: Re: DTD Versions
Previous by thread: V-3.9 PPP-HOWTO
Next by thread: Re: DTD Versions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread